Registered Dental Hygienist in Alternative Practice (RDHAP) Law and Ethics Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the RDHAP Law and Ethics Exam with our comprehensive quiz, featuring flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations. Get ready to excel in your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


When can the dental hygiene board decline to issue a license?

  1. When the application is incomplete

  2. When an applicant is underage

  3. When the applicant has a conviction that has elapsed the appeal period

  4. When the applicant has not practiced in the last five years

The correct answer is: When the applicant has a conviction that has elapsed the appeal period

The dental hygiene board can decline to issue a license if the applicant has a conviction that has elapsed the appeal period. This is because an applicant's criminal history is an essential factor in assessing their suitability for licensure. Even if the conviction has surpassed the time for appeal, it indicates a potential risk to public safety or the integrity of the profession. Licensing boards are tasked with ensuring that all licensed professionals meet specific ethical and legal standards, which include a thorough review of any past criminal behavior related to their professional duties. In contrast, the other options, while relevant issues, do not directly reflect the board's ability to decline a license based on a past conviction. An incomplete application can be remedied by submitting the required materials, and being underage typically pertains to meeting the minimum age requirement, which could also be addressed if the applicant reaches the appropriate age. Failing to practice for five years may suggest a lack of recent experience, but it does not equate to a legal barrier preventing the issuance of a license. Thus, the existence of a relevant conviction stands as a more serious and justifiable reason for denial.